Sai Sudharsan Dropped: Gill-Gambhir Face Backlash
The decision to drop B Sai Sudharsan Dropped from the Playing XI for the India vs South Africa 1st Test XI has triggered a significant Social Media Backlash Team Selection against captain Shubman Gill Gautam Gambhir and the team management. Despite the young batter recording scores of 87 and 39 in his most recent Test match against the West Indies, Sudharsan was shockingly omitted from the team at Eden Gardens, Kolkata, for a bowling-heavy side.
The management’s move to include four specialist spinners—Ravindra Jadeja, Washington Sundar, Kuldeep Yadav, and Axar Patel—while picking two wicket-keeper batters (Rishabh Pant and Dhruv Jurel) meant the in-form left-handed batter had to sit out. This decision, prioritizing bowling depth over a specialist No. 3 batter, has been widely criticized by former cricketers and fans alike, who see it as a lack of vision for securing India’s future top-order.
Shubman Gill Gautam Gambhir’s Spin Gambit
Captain Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir opted for a high-risk, high-reward strategy by picking a six-bowler attack to maximize wicket-taking potential on a surface that is expected to assist spin heavily from Day 3. Gill, who lost the toss and was forced to field first, addressed the selection vaguely, praising the team’s hunger but refusing to explain the omission of Sudharsan. “Rishabh comes back in place of Reddy since we last played. And Axar is also back in the side,” was Gill’s only explanation for the changes.
The inclusion of Axar Patel and the promotion of all-rounder Washington Sundar to the crucial No. 3 spot—a position Sudharsan was being groomed for—was the management’s way of injecting both batting depth and an extra bowling option. Sundar, who has scored a Test century overseas and provides a left-hand batting angle, was preferred due to the immediate pitch conditions, suggesting a short-term approach to team balancing.
No. 3 Slot Musical Chairs: Experts React
The fiercest criticism came from experts who highlighted the crucial nature of the No. 3 position, traditionally occupied by stalwarts like Cheteshwar Pujara and Rahul Dravid. Former India cricketer Dodda Ganesh launched a sharp public critique, questioning the rationale behind the change: “Why would you drop Sai Sudharsan? Makes no sense whatsoever.”
Ganesh further tore into the decision on social media platform X, stating the management was playing No. 3 Slot Musical Chairs “without a vision.” He argued: “The no 3 in the batting lineup is the most important slot in a test XI & India is playing musical chairs without a vision. Can’t believe this is happening at the test level. Should’ve given Sai Sudharsan these tests. You don’t need 4 spinners, no matter how much turn the pitch offers.”
Another former India batter, Aakash Chopra, echoed this sentiment, arguing that the management risks damaging the confidence of a promising player. Chopra questioned why Sudharsan was in the squad at all if the management lacked confidence in him and asserted that the No. 3 spot “cannot become a game of musical chairs,” underscoring the instability that has plagued the batting position since Pujara’s exit.
Social Media Backlash Team Selection Summary
The resulting Social Media Backlash Team Selection was immediate and widespread. Fans and pundits viewed the benching of Sudharsan, who averaged over 40 in his last Test series, as a premature abandonment of a long-term project. The decision implies that the team management is prioritizing all-rounders and bowling depth over specialist batting, even at the cost of stability in the crucial top-order. As the India vs South Africa 1st Test XI took the field, all eyes were on the performance of the chosen all-rounders, as any failure would amplify the growing chorus of criticism directed at Shubman Gill Gautam Gambhir for the controversial call to drop Sai Sudharsan Dropped.
Responses